CPUC delays California NEM 3.0 decision

Kelsey Misbrener

The California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) decided to indefinitely delay its decision on net-metering changes, according to SEIA.
“The proposed decision never made sense for a host of reasons. It would have compromised the reliability of California’s electricity delivery system, harmed California’s effort to tackle climate change and cut jobs and economic opportunities for all Californians. The increased costs and loss of demand for solar also would have made solar less accessible to moderate- and low-income families. We look forward to continuing to work with the California Public Utilities Commission as it considers any changes to net metering,” said Sean Gallagher, VP of state and regulatory affairs at SEIA, in a statement.
Reuters reported the new commission president Alice Reynolds asked for more time to analyze the record and consider revisions to the proposed decision on NEM 3.0. That proposed decision would have added new grid-use charges and shifted to a net billing structure, which combined would have resulted in lower incentives for rooftop solar customers. Wood Mackenzie predicted the proposed decision would cut the California residential solar market in half by 2024 because the economics would not make sense for many homeowners.
“Our analysis for the two largest utilities – Pacific Gas & Electric and Southern California Edison – reveals payback periods for typical residential solar projects built this year will increase from five to six years under current net metering to 14-15 years, depending on the utility,” said Bryan White, research analyst and co-author of the report.
The solar industry lobbied in force against the proposed decision, organizing rallies in Los Angeles and San Francisco and filling the phone lines during the CPUC’s Jan. 27 meeting to tell commissioners about the harm the proposed decision could inflict.

CPUC delays California NEM 3.0 decision

The California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) decided to indefinitely delay its decision on net-metering changes, according to SEIA.

“The proposed decision never made sense for a host of reasons. It would have compromised the reliability of California’s electricity delivery system, harmed California’s effort to tackle climate change and cut jobs and economic opportunities for all Californians. The increased costs and loss of demand for solar also would have made solar less accessible to moderate- and low-income families. We look forward to continuing to work with the California Public Utilities Commission as it considers any changes to net metering,” said Sean Gallagher, VP of state and regulatory affairs at SEIA, in a statement.

Reuters reported the new commission president Alice Reynolds asked for more time to analyze the record and consider revisions to the proposed decision on NEM 3.0. That proposed decision would have added new grid-use charges and shifted to a net billing structure, which combined would have resulted in lower incentives for rooftop solar customers. Wood Mackenzie predicted the proposed decision would cut the California residential solar market in half by 2024 because the economics would not make sense for many homeowners.

“Our analysis for the two largest utilities – Pacific Gas & Electric and Southern California Edison – reveals payback periods for typical residential solar projects built this year will increase from five to six years under current net metering to 14-15 years, depending on the utility,” said Bryan White, research analyst and co-author of the report.

The solar industry lobbied in force against the proposed decision, organizing rallies in Los Angeles and San Francisco and filling the phone lines during the CPUC’s Jan. 27 meeting to tell commissioners about the harm the proposed decision could inflict.

https://www.solarpowerworldonline.com/2022/02/cpuc-delays-decision-on-nem3/

Comments are closed.

Post Navigation